Browsing the archives for the Francis of Assisi tag

Pets and Islam: Wisdom from Francis of Assisi

Robert V. Taylor

Is there a connection between the blessing of animals on St. Francis Day and raging debates about Islam? Francis’ wisdom from the thirteenth century is urgently relevant today. 

In churches around the United States people will bring their pets and animals to be blessed in honor of the October 4th celebration of his life. In decades of providing such blessings I discovered beyond the sweetness of a child bringing a rabbit for a blessing that something more profound was at play. 

In his writings Francis celebrated the fraternity between human beings and all of Creation.  It was a radical departure from the prevailing theologies of his time about human subjugation of the earth and its creatures.

Sentimentality about Francis shrouds his disruptive belief that love is the sole grounding of our lives.  He lived in an era celebrating the omnipotence of God.  Imperial images of Christ were shattered by a simple act of his.  In 1223 he created the very first crèche scene depicting an earthy, ordinary and vulnerable infant.  It was a seismic shift in rethinking the relationships between Christians and the Holy.

This vulnerability connected with the experience of ordinary people. Francis believed that vulnerable love was the grounding of his religious tradition. The religious authorities of his day generally despised him.  The Francis statues adorning gardens and car dashboards would be an affront to their understanding of religion and power.  How we love the world – including all of its creatures and people – is the ultimate question that Francis believed we faced.

Almost eight centuries later Francis would find a distressing, sad sense of déjà vu in the raging battles being fought over Islam and the building of Mosques.

Francis lived during the time of the Crusades waged by Christians against Muslims.  His understanding of loving the world and the interconnection of all things led him to denounce the war of his time against Islam.  He thought it was sacrilege.

Francis’ visit to Egypt met with strong resistance from one of the most powerful cardinals who pursued military victory and glory from the Crusades. Francis persisted, believing that love of the Holy was lived out in peacemaking as much as it is experienced among all people and creatures.

Returning from his visit with Muslim leaders Francis introduced a new greeting into the services of his monks – “May the Lord give you peace.”  It is thought that he adapted the traditional greeting with which Islam expects Muslims will greet all people – “Peace be upon you.”  We know that Francis was moved and impressed by the devotion of Muslims in their five daily calls to prayer.  Learning form this, he introduced the Angelus into Europe to be prayed three times a day.

The wisdom and ethic of Francis of Assisi speak as freshly today as they did centuries ago.  Like the Buddha who invites us to seek happiness for all people, Francis was driven by a passion for the oneness of all people.  Not a bland undifferentiated sameness, but the Holy revealed in his own tradition, Islam and Judaism as much as in Creation.

The blessing of animals will be celebrated with joy in countless places across the United States invoking and celebrating Francis.

Invoking Francis’ core message of our interconnection, of peacemaking and honoring the holy in all is an even more poignant celebration of this man from Assisi.

Post your comment or response below

Join Robert’s YouTube conversation about experiencing The Holy in Nautre

Read or post comments

Is There a Spirituality of Christmas?

Is there a spirituality to Christmas that reaches beyond religion and Christianity?  I believe so.  It is more than gift giving, baubles and Santa’s that draw so many non-Christians to this holiday.  Christmas invites people into three compelling spiritual truths:  the promise of becoming fully alive; discovering the Holy in the midst of the messiness of life and, hope.  The disruptive manger scene is an invitation to see beyond the lines of religion.

Almost 800 years ago Francis of Assisi created the first Christmas manger scene.  His live tableau reflected his imagining of the people and creatures gathered for the birth of Christ.  Francis’ nativity scene was a spiritually disruptive event – one of those moments that disrupt and open up the prevailing or dominant way of thinking.

Francis’ stealth move of cracking open a window into the Holy shed light on the distant, stultified view of the Divine which prevailed in the Western European churches.  God was omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent.  The disruptive brilliance of the manger scene was a seismic change in re-ordering the spirituality of everyday life.

The infant in the manger scene is a crying, giggling, charming, annoying, playful, sleeping baby.  The infant is an invitation to become fully alive with all of the contradictions that make us human.  To be spiritual is after all about becoming fully alive.  The word for spirituality means “breath of life”.   One of the invitations of Christmas comes in the notion of Incarnation – of the Holy taking on human form.  Whatever one’s personal belief of that view is, it is an iconic image of Divine life pulsating in a tiny child. For many, celebrating Christmas is an earthy response to the spiritual truth which it conveys – of the breath of life, of being fully alive, as spiritual gift for every person.

The second compelling truth that Christmas conveys is that the spiritual is discovered in the messiness and complexity of human life. The so-called Holy Family are comprised of a teenage mother who became pregnant before marriage,  a husband who is so disorganized that he cannot even arrange accommodation and a child given birth to on a rock among animals.  It is a homeless holy family.  This family dysfunction is part of the universal appeal of this holiday – the spiritual truth that the Holy is discovered in the messy, unfinished nature of our ordinary lives.

The third thing that invites celebration of Christmas is love and hope born in a child.  A child who represents the universal pathway  between the human and the holy.  A child who offers the promise of the holy present in the messiness and breath of everyday lives.  For many, Christmas is a renewal of hope, of re-imagined belief in the possibility of the impossible; of the chance to re-birth and renew that human and the holy meeting in our lives.

The electric snow-person that I received as a gift may be beguilingly silly as it changes color.  It might amuse us in the way that the inflatable plastic helicopter with Santa aloft on someone’s lawn caused me to smile as I drove by it.  Or the sparkling lights adorning people’s homes may enchant us, reminding us that the flickering lights dance with life. Or the vast plastic Santa’s on the wall of an office building in Tokyo may cause us to stop and ask if our eyes are tricking us. For many, this is the sum of Christmas.

For Christians, their entire faith and belief system is predicated on the birth of the Savior at Christmas.  The Christ whom they see as having been foretold in the writings of the Hebrew Scriptures is the fulfillment of an ancient promise they believe.  No wonder Christians sing about the “Holy Night” on which Christ was born and revel in songs like “Joy to the World”.   The beauty and joy of many Christian celebrations of Christmas is enough to thaw the heart of a turgid curmudgeon.

But for many others, those who are spiritual but not religious, or those who practice another religious tradition, there is a gracious universal invitation to Christmas.  The promise of becoming fully alive as a spiritual person, the reminder of the Holy mixed up in the bundle of life and the hope represented in a universal child revealing the Divine – these are spiritual truths and gifts to many at Christmas.  So the celebrations are joined for many varied reasons.

What does the spirituality of Christmas say to you and even those you love?

Join the blog, post your response at  http://www.robertvtaylor.com/blog/archives

Read or post comments

Rejoicing in death of a child? Nathan Halbach, Son abandoned by Father

Nathan Halbach has only several weeks to live before his 22 year old life ends. His battle with cancer is coming to an end. Nathan’s biological father is a Roman Catholic priest who chose to be an absent dad. The Roman Catholic Church has wished Nathan and his mother away. Nathan’s mom, Pat Bon, believes the church will rejoice when her son dies. If only they had followed President Obama’s advice (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/23931.html) on the ethic of responsibility: “What makes you a man is not the ability to have a child but the courage to raise one.” Nathan’s courageous life sheds a light on responsibility.

Nathan’s dad is Fr. Henry Wallenberg, a member of the Franciscan order of St. Francis of Assisi. As a young priest he fathered Nathan. After this family lived together for five years the Franciscans demanded a legal agreement with Nathan’s mother to separate the family and guarantee her silence. (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/us/16priest.html?pagewanted=all) Surely not a pro-life move to break up and silence a family?

Pat Bond’s attempts to get support from the church for the exorbitant medical bills for Nathan’s cancer treatments were fruitless. Until the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) picked up on the story. It turns out that Nathan’s dad is facing allegations of abusing a female high school student. SNAP’s involvement resulted in yesterday’s announcement that the church would pay for Nathan’s burial expenses. How ironic.

Last night Pat Bond spoke on CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 (http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0911/10/acd.02.html) about how the church had wanted her and Nathan out of their lives. Speaking about the offer to pay for Nathan’s funeral expenses she said, “The day my son goes, the church will rejoice”. It seems incomprehensible to imagine that Pat Bond is correct. The thought of such rejoicing is vile. More so, because it is consistent with Pat’s experience. She is not looking for retributive justice. Will restorative justice be offered?

This is not a story about the merits, behavioral impacts or wisdom of celibacy. It is not a story of sexual abuse. Although it may raise those questions for many.

It is a story about the value that marked St. Francis’ life and for which he was hounded – love. Hundreds of years ago Francis wrote about imagining God coming to his house and asking for charity. Francis says he fell on his knees and asked what he might give. “Just love. Just love.” Pat and Henry had the love of a family destroyed by an imposed agreement. Nathan had no choice in this matter of love being turned in on destruction.

It is also a story about responsibility. President Obama’s Father’s Day remarks could be a study guide for institutions that are in the business of supporting life and families. It takes courage to raise a child. Abandoned by his own father, the President’s words are a call to be responsible for one another. Francis would have approved! He knew that words were no substitute for actions. For centuries, legions of Francis’ followers have lived by his rule of love and responsibility for all.

It is a story that co-joins love with responsibility. Like Obama, Nathan was abandoned by his father, Father Henry. Nothing will restore that loss. Like the President’s own mother, Pat Bond has been a single parent whose life reveals what responsibility means. The lack of responsibility on the part of the other players is jarring.

Is it possible that the legacy of Nathan’s all too short life will be a gift shining new light on responsibility? Francis would have approved. If that is so, there will not be rejoicing at his death, but profound thanks for a life of courageous responsibility.

Read more at www.robertvtaylor.com

Watch Robert V. Taylor discussing Ethics and Spirituality at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFU0-hDSVpQ&feature=player_embedded#

Read or post comments