Browsing the archives for the Desmond Tutu tag

How to end relationship dysfunction

This excerpt for A New Way to Be Human was published on Beliefnet.com February 2013 with permission of the publisher New Page Books

Risky invitations interrupt the imagined or assumed course of your life, raising the stakes right where you struggle the most. Responding to these invitations takes you beyond your comfort zone, inviting transformation and an enlarged understanding of yourself, others and the Holy. The murder of Steve Biko in 1977 presented me with a risky invitation.

“Biko’s death cannot go unanswered,” I said. “None of us want to sit back and be passive do we?” asked Maureen as she looked around the room where seven of us sat cradling mugs of tea. We all shook our heads in silent agreement. I said, “It’s why we’re here. I feel helpless and I want to do something.” We were beginning to respond to a risky invitation. I had no idea that the journey we were about to embark on would reveal so much about being spiritually and physically present.

Steve Biko was a hero to many of us. In 1977, while being held in custody he was killed by the authorities. In an attempt to crush the reactions to his death all public gatherings of more than three people had been declared to be illegal.

In his death I realized that the government’s desire to control, to dehumanize and to deny happiness to others was like a voracious demon with an insatiable appetite. As we sat with Maureen’s question one person said, “We can begin by praying.” I suggested, “What if our prayers become part of an eight day fast leading up to Biko’s funeral?” The willingness to give something up in order to be awake to new possibilities stood in contrast to the lust to deny the humanity of others that would stop at nothing to achieve its goal.

As our small group of students and faculty planned a fast built around prayer, meditation and discussion our raw emotions ranged from anger and disbelief to mourning and lamentation. “What if we took some visible action?” I then quickly added, “As much as praying let’s engage people in thinking about what is happening in our country.”

“But what about the ban on public gatherings of more than three people?” someone asked. I felt fear at the mention of this ban because I knew that contravention of it would result in harsh actions from the authorities for whom human lives were dispensable. I said, “Let’s think about a procession of mourners in which you only see one mourner at a time.” The idea electrified the group. Quickly we decided that the university’s tradition of wearing black academic gowns in the dining halls at night could become the dress code of a planned procession whose route would be through the main street of the college town.  One person at a time would travel the route wearing a black gown, carrying a wreath in their hands. So our protest march of mourning and lamentation was born as a companion to the fast.

Two days later the phone rang in my dorm.  “Please withdraw from this fast and protest,” my parents demanded. They had seen the photograph of me in the protest march which had appeared in several South African newspapers. “We’re scared for your safety. You know what happens to people who speak up in this country.”

As they implored me to “be quiet” I said, “What if people had spoken out against the Nazis?  What if we worked for the humanity of every person instead of rejecting, excluding or killing?” Our conversation ended tersely.

I woke up in the early hours of the morning thinking about the conversation with my parents. At seven o’clock I was in the chapel for our morning meditation time. I finally interrupted the silence and said, “Let’s attend Biko’s funeral.” No sooner had I uttered the word than I thought, “You must be crazy Robert!”

On the day of the funeral we left early on a bus that would drive us several hundred miles to the football stadium in which it would be held. Our small band of college students quickly noticed the helicopters flying overhead and the talk about police informers photographing those present. We entered a stadium filled with more than thirty thousand people.

At the end of the funeral a very short man appeared on the stadium field. He told the crowds, “God loves you. Please be God’s partners in love. If you take up violence you will become just like those who have killed Biko.” He begged the mourning crowd to find another way to end apartheid. “With violence you will lose your humanity” he said. This man of small stature with a towering message was Desmond Tutu. He had the crowd in the palm of his hand. Every person was straining forward so as not to miss a single word or inflection.

Back at the campus a South African curry with its intriguing blend of spices, vegetables and meat that had simmered for hours, seemed to be a fitting meal for the breaking of our fast. Over the meal we spoke about Tutu’s invitation that continued to reverberate in our conversation. One person said, “He treated everyone like an adult with a choice to make about where our hearts belong.”

In responding to being both physically and spiritually present in this time of turmoil I began to understand the pathway of responding to risky invitations.

When you clutch at the imagined certainties of your life you keep life at bay, and drain and distance yourself from your journey with the Holy. To turn back from the risky invitations of your journey is to trifle with life by willfully denying yourself the fullness of who you are meant to be.

The risky invitations are much more than a surprise disrupting your familiar patterns; they are a gift connecting you with others in new mindfulness about what it means to be fully human. Our lives are replete with refusals and acceptances. It is never too late on your journey to develop mindful openness to the risky invitations presented to you.

Read my in A New Way to Be Human available at Indie bookstores, B&N and Amazon

Read or post comments

Stones of Hope?

Robert V. Taylor

Robert V. Taylor

If ever we need mountains of despair to be hewn into stones of hope this is the moment. The unveiling of the Martin Luther King Jr. monument on the National Mall in Washington DC is a gift to the nation. King’s unabashed hope in our capacity to transcend differences and work for justice that celebrates our need of one another is as timely today as it was during his remarkable life. How will you honor this legacy of his?

     King once asked if you and I would make a career of humanity, committing ourselves to a noble struggle – “You will make a greater person of yourself, a greater nation of your country, and a finer world to live in.” His words are as poignant an invitation to us today as they were in 1959.

     In my thirty-one years in the United States I’ve never before experienced the despair and sense of creeping malaise that is fueled by a confluence of factors. Persistent high unemployment, widening gulfs of resources, declining home values, brinkmanship politics, rabid divisiveness, wars that are not just unfunded but morally bankrupt – this are just a few of the realities coalescing in our collective psyche at this juncture in time. 

MLK Memorial

MLK Memorial

     And yet I remain filled with hope about our potential for goodness, our innate compassion and our capacity to be part of what Dr. King described as the “arc of the moral universe” that bends towards justice. I see and hear it expressed it in the people who attend my workshops and presentations; they’re each longing to be part of a new way to be human – together.

     They’re obviously self-selecting participants on a journey of personal growth and discovery about becoming more fully alive.  But their personal quest usually reflects a profound longing for deeper inter-connection. It’s a yearning that reflects Desmond Tutu’s talk about Ubuntu – that a person is only a person in the context of other persons. Or King’s observation that, “We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly.”

Entrance to MLK Memorial

Entrance to MLK Memorial

     The monument unveiled on the National Mall invites us to step beyond the current mood of despair or disgust and into its invitation.  In his “I Have a Dream” speech given on the Mall in 1963, King rallied the nation with the call that “We will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope.” You approach the site by walking through a split boulder and discover on the other side a solitary stone in which his image emerges.

     It is an image inviting us to move beyond the mire and envision the hope that becomes a reality when people of compassion and love make choices not to remain silent. It is an invitation into a collective consciousness of what exists beyond the mire of despair. Some may refer to it a quintessentially American optimism. It may be that but it is also more – it is a reminder that every thought, intention and action joins together with those of others to forge a new path.

     The new monument is nestled alongside a Japanese gift of cherry trees given as a sign of unity and peace between nations that were once at war. The spring cherry blossoms are a reminder of rebirth, renewal, beauty and hope. They are qualities that reflect our individual journey to becoming more fully alive as well as our collective human arc of becoming more fully human in our mutuality.

     The unveiling of the monument at this moment in our history re-births the timelessness of Dr. Martin Luther King’s courage, vision, leadership and abiding hope in our goodness. We best celebrate and honor his life and the monument’s invitation by asking how we each hew stones of hope.

     How will you become a stone of hope? The world needs that hope from each of us.

Post your comments about the Memorial and Stones of  Hope here 

Watch Robert discuss what it means for each of us to be a Repairer of the World – click here

Read or post comments

Westboro Baptist – Gas in the Hatred?

Robert V. Taylor

Robert V. Taylor

I know about Westboro Baptist Church.  I’ve been picketed by them twice for being gay.  The New York Times is correct – the Supreme Court ruling protecting their freedom of speech is a good decision. Maggie Phelps of Westboro may believe that the Court’s decision gives them an “international megaphone” for hatred. But there’s no gas in the hatred.

In an 8 – 1 ruling the Supreme Court on Wednesday protected one of the most cherished American rights of freedom of speech. Their “God hates fags” message is a violent assault. My first reaction was to feel outrage at the ruling. Yet I would not have the court rule differently. If Westboro’s freedom of speech were curtailed so might yours or mine be. Would you or I want that possibility?

In 1998 Fred Phelps and his family, who comprise the membership of this tiny church in Topeka, Kansas, picketed the funeral of Matthew Shepard. Matthew was tortured, beaten to death and strung up on a fence in Wyoming for being gay. As the Billings Gazette reports, it was their first taste of serious media attention for their homophobic venom.  

Matthew Shepard

Westboro has escalated its protests, picketing the funerals of hundreds of US soldiers killed in combat.  This public intrusion on grieving families is motivated by their belief God is judging America for being too inclusive of LGBT people. The lack of compassion and respect for the dead and the grieving is beyond comprehension. No wonder the American Legion provides motorcycle brigades to shield grieving families from the church’s picket signs.

When Westboro protested my leadership as an openly gay leader their website was replete with cartoon images of me burning in hell fornicating with animals. Each time they protested, the congregation I served was filled to capacity with those who came to express a different spiritual perspective of oneness and inclusion.

Media attention garnered for Westboro at each of those protests might have led you to believe that the Phelps family church spoke on behalf of a vast constituency. In reality the media coverage shone a light on hatred that led people to say, “They do not speak for me.”  Free speech should always be illuminated by the light of day. Even the most noxious free speech helps to clarify our thinking.

Westboro picketers

Westboro picketers

I still believe that the humanity of those like the Westboro picketers is to be honored. Hating those who hate only imprisons the hater, no matter the “righteousness” of the issue.  When I’m silent about the exclusion or denigration of another person or myself I give power to the hatred and exclusion. When I intentionally practice compassion as a way of life, I join with you and others in creating a different narrative of the human story.   

As a teenager in South Africa I was astounded to discover that the framework of apartheid was a theological for justifying the hatred, violence and degradation of people based on race. The vast resources deployed to enforce that view were no match for the spirituality of compassion, oneness and inclusion that people like Desmond Tutu invited people into. 

Archbishop Desmond M. Tutu

Hatred was not conquered by silencing it. The voices of hope refused to be silent. Those who claimed the free speech of a fuller vision of what it means to be human were on the winning side.

So it will be with the Phelps family church message. Free speech invites us to consider our values. It invites us to consider what it means to be part of the human family and who this family includes. It is up to us to be proactive free speech missionaries pointing to a richer, more just vision of how we all belong together.

There is no gas is the Westboro hatred. To be defined by what we hate is to live in a prison. When my free speech and actions find delight in those who are different I am reminded that we all want the same thing – to be loved, happy and honored for who we are. That is high octane fuel that propels us to speak and act on behalf of our oneness. 

Conflict, even conflicted feelings about the Supreme Court ruling, invites us to work for the well-being of all. That is the real meaning of peace. 

I am hopeful because of the Court’s ruling. The real question is how we will nurture speech and actions that are about the extraordinary value of every human being. What does it mean for you to be a vocal voice of hope?

Join the conversation! Share your reactions and comments below

Exclusion in the Name of God? View Robert’s You Tube conversation by clicking here

Subscribe to the free RSS feed to be notified of new blog postings at Wake Up For Life! – click here

Read or post comments

Harvey Milk & God Terrified Me

Harvey Milk and God each terrified me.  In that order.  I was a young white anti-apartheid activist in South Africa in the nineteen-seventies.  To be openly gay filled me with more fear than the fight against apartheid.  Yet I knew in my bones that Harvey Milk and anti-apartheid activists were pointing to the same truth about the magnificence of each person.

As a young man I rejected the theological and political notion that apartheid was divinely sanctioned.  It was inconceivable to me that humanity could be denied to another person based on race.  Yet that was the moral and religious justification claimed for a system based on the superiority of whites in South Africa.

My activism was strengthened by the courage of religious leaders like Desmond Tutu. They insisted that God loves every single person.  Equality, justice and human rights were expressions of that love.  As a young man I was certain that our differences were less significant than the oneness of our humanity. Except when it applied to me.  

Learning about Harvey Milk’s election to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977 was shocking news. It seemed impossible to conceive of an openly gay elected official in South Africa where legislation gave impunity to the police to act against LGBT people.

I was a candidate for ordination to the Anglican priesthood in South Africa in the nineteen seventies.   I’d witnessed the witch hunt conducted by the church against gay seminarians.  I used to go to Mass each day to get on my knees to plead for God to change me; to take away my sexual orientation. 

Following Harvey Milk’s assassination in 1978 I experienced an epiphany.  If God had no use for hatred and exclusion based on race, surely the same was true about sexual orientation.  The truth of this filled me with terror.  Was Harvey Milk’s courage an invitation for all LGBT people everywhere to stop pleading to be changed?

The possibility of Harvey Milk and God offering an invitation to get up off our knees was an exhilarating truth.  It would take me years to live fully into that liberating notion of becoming fully human.  In the process I discovered that the root word for courage is the same word for love.  Maybe Tutu was correct that the Holy loved all people without condition. I imagined God smiling on Milk’s courage.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Mpho Tutu & Robert V. Taylor

Fifteen years later I asked Desmond Tutu when he would add LGBT people into his compelling vision that we are all “made for oneness.” He assured me that it would be after the fall of apartheid.  This iconic leader has been true to his word.  To the ire of many and the delight of others, Tutu is insistent that there are no outsiders with God or the human family. 

The shadow side of Milk’s invitation to courage was violence.  To be physically harmed or killed because of who you are is not something that most people seek.  My experience of threats directed against me over the years because of my openness as a gay man remind me that we have a long way to go in the United States before LGBT people know that we are viewed as outsiders.

But Harvey Milk’s life continues to have a ripple effect.  The young videographer who recently filmed me for a Seattle Men’s Chorus video unexpectedly told me that I’d been a hero of his.  I could not imagine why.  He said that as a high school student my prominence as an openly gay leader had given him courage in grappling with his own sexuality.  It was a simple moment.  In every encounter like that one I give thanks for the courage of people like Harvey Milk.  A young millennial man took for granted his ability to be open about his identity.  It seemed like reason enough to celebrate!

In the rural farming community of Eastern Washington where my partner and I spend time, we know that the politics is not as progressive as it is in cities like Seattle or New York.  But we hear the stories of families who accept, love and include their LGBT members.  For these families it is not a struggle, but a given.  I imagine Harvey Milk and God smiling on such inclusion.

The terror that Harvey Milk and God instilled in me have long dissipated.    Terror has made way for courage.  My own experience of exclusion is a reminder that it is dangerous to dismiss or exclude any person or group of people.  Harvey Milk’s courage is an invitation to celebrate oneness with our own self and others.

Share your story here!

Join Robert’s YouTube conversation about the Holy who includes and delights in each person – Exclusion in the Name of God – by clicking here

Read or post comments

Obama – Our Prince of Peace?

Is President Obama our Prince of Peace?  Whether you think the President deserves the 2009 Nobel Peace prize or not, the award sticks to him like bees drawn to nectar.  Expectations about him as a peacemaker or the dismissal of the award coming too soon in this young presidency both miss the point.  The more significant question is how we are each peacemakers in our own spheres of influence.

When the Obama’s attend church on Christmas they will be among the hundreds of millions reminded of the birth of a child revered as the Prince of Peace.  The Christ of the Christian tradition speaks about peacemakers being “blessed”.   The juxtaposition of the peace prize being awarded within days of a deeper commitment to the war in Afghanistan is an irony reflecting the precarious nature of what we understand as “peace”.

In the time of Christ peace was widely understood to mean the absence of conflict for the Roman Empire.  The Hebrew tradition of Christ viewed peace as the “well-being” of all.  This was a social construct.  It was about the well-being of economic, spiritual and social relationships.  Quite different from an absence of conflict.  The Prince of Peace’s peace is proactive and engaged.  It is a peace that celebrates our inter-connectedness.  We are part of one human family in which our own well being is only possible when the well-being of all is actively pursued.

Obama is not the Prince of Peace.  Time will tell whether he is an active peacemaker or not.  But he does bring a refreshing understanding of what it means for Americans to be part of the human family that includes all, not just some.  If he becomes an activist peacemaker his successes will reflect how we each  understand ourselves to be about peace, about well-being for all.

From his Hindu tradition Gandhi believed swaraj, the concept of self-restraint, meant that all of the necessities of life should be enjoyed alike by all – the wealthy, poor and comfortable.   Gandhi said, “I give you a talisman:  Whenever you are in doubt, or when the self becomes too much with you, apply the following test.  Recall the face of the poorest and weakest man whom you may have seen, and ask yourself is the step you contemplate is going to be of any use to him.  Will he gain anything by it?  Will it restore him to a control over his own fate and destiny? In other words, will it lead to swaraj for the hungry and starving millions?  Then you will find you own doubts and yourself melting away.”

What a talisman for us and the newest Nobel Laureate!  Although Gandhi was never awarded the Nobel, even thought he was nominated for it five times, he is the spiritual and moral leader of the non-violence movement.  Gandhi, like the Noel Peace Laureates Muhammad Yunus, Desmond Tutu, the Dalai Lama and Nelson Mandela, understood that without the well-being of all, peace is an illusion.

Leaders can’t do it alone.  Leaders need the encouragement and participation of others.  No wonder Mr. Obama paid homage today to the organizations and legions of people working for peace and well-being around the world.  The President has the moral leadership and capacity to engage and invite us to each to support the well-being of all.

While congratulating the President on becoming a Nobel Peace Laureate, it is we who are invited to be re-engaged with the entire human family.  Then peace will begin to break out.

Read or post comments

Hate Unleashed in DC: A Religious Value?

Christian clergy will spew hatred in Washington DC on Monday.  Their fury has been aroused by the new Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act.   Venomous, hate-filled language is an odd thing for religious folk to spend time on.  Imagine that energy being used to promote compassion, love, mercy, justice or feeding the hungry. Gay and lesbian people are the target of this vitriol.  Religiously motivated disdain and hatred are not pretty.  Or spiritual.  Why this bizarre confluence of hate toward LGBT people?

The organizers of the Rally for Religious Freedom say they want to raise “alarm” over the new hate crimes law.  They claim that the new legislation infringes on their religious right to rail against lesbian and gay people.  They say the legislation prevents them from proclaiming the “whole counsel of God”.  They believe that the “whole counsel of God” includes stirring up disdain and hatred towards LGBT people.

Outside the Justice Department building in DC these religious leaders hope to be arrested for their proclamation against gay and lesbian Americans.  This coalition, which includes the Christian Anti Defamation Commission and Liberty Council, is a more polished iteration of Fred Phelps’ one gospel tune of protesting gays wherever he imagines us to be found, including the burial of US soldiers.

I’ve been the target of Fred Phelps’ protests.  The level of venom and hatred is so shocking to most people that it invites a lot of personal reflection.  Most Americans are decent folks who do not want to be associated with such naked hatred.  Fred Phelps, like the organizers of Monday’s protests, actually becomes ambassadors of a more tolerant, diverse America.

The spit-fire from Monday’s protests is also aimed at the Obama administration.  One of the organizers, Gary Cass, believes that Obama’s support of the legislation was to “pay back militant homosexual activists who raised millions of dollars for his campaign and worked to get him elected.”  Cass says that this is all part of Obama’s “radical, anti-Christian agenda”.

The legislation is named in honor of Matthew Shepard who was murdered in Wyoming for being gay.  The new law makes acts of violence against LGBT people illegal.   Is it radical to legislate to ensure that no young woman or man is put to death as Matthew Shepard was? Is it radical to enshrine in our laws that every human life is sacred and should be free of the threat of violent acts?

The Judeo-Christian scriptures have very little to say about homosexuality as we know it.  They do have a lot to say about loving our neighbor as ourselves.  They speak at length about mercy, justice and love for all.  The defining mark of these sacred texts is love of others.  It is the mirror image of loving God.  This is the “whole counsel” of spirituality!  It is a way of seeking dignity and freedom for all people.

Hate is a consuming business.  The wisdom of most spiritual traditions is about compassion.  Spirituality is about becoming fully alive.  The path of becoming fully alive is sabotaged by the energy needed to keep fueling hatred.

I’ll happily cast my lot with Martin Luther King Jr., the Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu, Bono, Thich Nhat Hahn and the other spiritual bearers of love and compassion.  Our human story is about seeking goodness in one another.

Not far from Monday’s protesters is a small park with a statue of Mahatma Gandhi.  In the park is his mantra – “My life is my message”.   Love and compassion for Gandhi were never known in tearing down or inciting hatreds.  The good spiritual energy is known when we detach from disdain and hatred and cast our lot with love, compassion and justice.  For all.

Read more at www.robertvtaylor.com

Watch Robert discussing exclusion and inclusion on YouTube

Read or post comments

Compassion: a dynamic new movement?

Compassion appears to be in short supply these days.  The Charter for Compassion is a new movement to reclaim this ancient truth found in most spiritual and moral traditions.  Yesterday it was unveiled in 125 cities around the world!  The Dalai Lama and Archbishop Desmond Tutu were among the initial signers of the charter.  They may be onto something.  The people who showed up in those 125 cities are certainly onto something too!

A multi day gathering called Seeds of Compassion www.seedsofcompassion.org drew more than 150,000 participants in Seattle last year.  The lead line-up included His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Archbishop Desmond Tutu.  During their visit I hosted a breakfast conversation with them.  Those present could not have missed their playfulness and humor!  What is striking is that these two spiritual leaders have stood against powerful forces of violence and hatred.  They are unflinching in their resistance to injustice. Yet there they were joshing with each other, taking delight in life.  Their playful interactions, like their lives, reflect compassion within, without and for others.

I marveled at the vast number of people who showed up in Seattle to engage in conversations about compassion in the world.  For many who refer to themselves as spiritual not religious, compassion is an authentic, compelling spiritual value.  When you experience it in another, you know that is for real.  The large crowds in Seattle are, I believe, indicative of a deep spiritual hunger for meaning and purpose.  There is no elaborate dogma attached to compassion.

The Charter for Compassion http://www.charterforcompassion.org begins with a reminder that the principle of compassion I sat the heart of all traditions – ethical, religious and spiritual.  It calls for the restoration of compassion to the center of morality and religion.  The signers express urgency about making compassion “a clear, luminous and dynamic force in our polarized world.”

Reflecting the simplicity of compassion, the document speaks simply about compassion as a way of being.  It does not side-step the question that drives so many away from, or into ambivalence, about religion.  It asks that there be a “return to the ancient principle that any interpretation of scripture that breeds violence, hatred or disdain is illegitimate.”  Simplicity is not to be confused with shallowness or lack of spine!  Breeding disdain, violence and hatred of any kind is rejected with simple clarity.  That is a breath of fresh air billowing through the religious clutter of disdain and hatred! Is this what people all over the world are responding to in the unveiling of the Charter- compassion as the legitimate grounding of spiritual life?

The language of the document reminds me of Desmond Tutu’s persistent reminder that we are all made for “oneness”. Or of the Dalia Lama insisting that we are all inter-twined.  Is the authentic compassion of these two spiritual leaders what caused over 150,000 in Seattle to come out and talk about compassion?

The Charter for Compassion recognizes that compassion is taught and instilled in the lives of the young when they are given, “accurate and respectful information about other traditions, religions and cultures.” It doesn’t stop there.   It urges a pro-active apperception of cultural and religious diversity.

Is this all simply about a “feel good” experience?   The Charter reminds us that when we denigrate others, even our enemies, we deny “or common humanity.” It invites us to “cultivate an informed empathy with the suffering of all human beings.”

I read this and I think of Tutu and the Dalai Lama poking each other in the ribs and laughing like delighted children over breakfast.  Their joy, in spite of all they have lived through, is palpable. It is the real thing.  They have each cultivated compassion for themselves and for those who have been their enemies.  Compassion for them, as it is for us, is a way of being.  It is about a mindful approach to life.  We cultivate it.

Compassion may be the only bridge across which divisions, violence and hatred can be re-imagined.  As I looked at those present at the unveiling of The Charter for Compassion last night in Seattle I had the feeling that I was witnessing the start of a grassroots movement.  A spiritual movement that reflected the hope, yearning and expectation in the eyes of the 150,000 who came to hear Tutu, the Dalai Lama and others speak about compassion.  Unlike those crowds, the supporters of the Charter are part of a connected network that technology has made possible.  Technology is making possible the reminder that compassion is the abiding, central truth of all spiritual and moral traditions.

Read more at http://www.robertvtaylor.com

Watch Robert discussing Building a Values Based Framework on YouTube

Read or post comments